On
 January 31, 2012 I was one of four panelists at the Necessary 
Sacrifices Pre-Performance Seminar hosted by the Ford’s Theater Society.
 The seminar, held in  Ford’s Theater Center for Education and 
Leadership, investigated the lives and leadership of Abraham Lincoln and
 Frederick Douglass. The following is what I shared: 
                                                                
In the autumn of 1847, in the last issue of The Mystery, the mother of The North Star,
 Martin Delany wrote, “We leave ‘The Mystery’ for a union with the far 
famed and world renowned Frederick Douglass, as a co-laborer, in the 
cause of our oppressed brethren, by publication of a large and capacious
 paper, ‘The North Star’ in Rochester, N.Y., … which cannot fail to be 
productive and of signal benefit to the slave and our nominally free 
brethren when the head and heart of Douglass enters into the 
combination.”
In Frederick Douglass’ autobiography Life and Times there is no mention of this “combination” with Delany.  Douglass claims the sole proprietorship of The North Star referring to it as simply “my paper.”  Yet the paper was clearly their paper
 with backing from established African American leaders.  Douglass’ 
failure to mention this “combination” deprives his readers of 
information critical to understanding African American leaders and their
 activities before and during the Civil War.
In the late 18th and early 19th
 centuries, African American leaders such as Prince Hall, Absalom Jones,
 George Lawrence, and Lewis Woodson advocated working in league with the
 Constitution to end slavery and to gain their rights as citizens. 
 Allan Pinkerton would come to know the secret national organization 
derived from their advocacy as the “Loyal League,” of which The Mystery and The North Star
 were organs.  The organization was also known as the Legal League and 
in the Mississippi Valley as Lincoln’s Legal Loyal League or simply the 
4Ls.  
   
League
 insiders believed that the Declaration of Independence and the 
Constitution were in the words of Absalom Jones “divine instruments of 
goodness.”  They believed that the Constitution was an anti-slavery 
document and that in league with that “divine instrument of goodness,” 
they could end the tyranny of slavery and gain their rights as citizens.
  Until the autumn of 1847, as a self-proclaimed disciple of William 
Lloyd Garrison, Douglass believed that the Constitution was a 
pro-slavery document.  Yet when Douglass “enters into the combination” 
with Delany, a League insider, Douglass embraced the belief that the 
Constitution was an anti-slavery document.  In Life and Times,
 Douglass discusses this change in position, but he fails to mention 
those who persuaded or influenced him to change his position.
Douglass and Delany were indeed co-founders and co-editors of The North Star.  A careful examination of Delany’s and Douglass’ articles in their paper
 reveals clearly that Delany targeted African American readers while 
Douglass targeted European American readers.  As the Civil War 
approached, Douglass was the most influential African American voice 
among European Americans while Delany was the “planner” or rather the 
operations officer for the Loyal League relinquishing leadership of the 
secret organization to William Howard Day in 1856.
On
 January 26, 1863, Governor John Andrew of Massachusetts was granted 
permission by Secretary of War Edwin Stanton to raise African descent 
regiments for Federal service, and Andrew commissioned George Stearns to
 head the recruiting effort.  That February Stearns employed Douglass as
 a recruiting agent in New York.  Douglass’ first recruit was his 
youngest son Charles, but his eldest son Lewis did not enlist at that 
time.  Douglass’ recruitment speech “Men of Color to Arms” appeared in 
the Frederick Douglass Monthly
 in March 1863; however, it is important to note that Douglass’ journal 
was not the journal of choice for the young men of African descent who 
joined the Massachusetts regiments.  The Anglo-African edited by Robert Hamilton in New York City was their journal of choice.  And the most prolific recruiter for the 54th
 Massachusetts in New York was not Frederick Douglass. The most prolific
 recruiter in New York was George Stevens, a war correspondent for the Anglo-African
 who had covered both Battles of Bull Run and the Battle of Antietam. 
 Stevens himself enlisted in the Fifty-fourth, became the first sergeant
 of company B and was commissioned a 2nd lieutenant in 1865.
Douglass was more successful as a fund raiser than he was as a recruiter.  The most successful recruiters for the 54th
 Massachusetts were in Ohio.  Thirty-two percent of the regiment was 
recruited out of Ohio with an African American businessman O. S. B. Wall
 and an African American lawyer John Mercer Langston being the top 
recruiters in that state.  However, the individual who emerges as the 
most important coordinator of the recruitment of African descent 
soldiers in 1863 was Martin Delany.  Headquartered in Chicago, Delany 
was first engaged as a recruiting agent for Massachusetts, and he became
 the managing agent in the West and Southwest for other northern states.
  In association with an African American businessman in Chicago John 
Jones, they were able “to raise black troops from all parts of the 
country.”  Delany reported to Secretary Stanton, “We are able sir, to 
command all the effective black men, as agents, in the United States.” 
 Emphasis here is that Delany was able “to command” effective agents not
 simply be an effective agent.  With Delany you got an effective 
organization while with Douglass you got a notable personality.  
It
 was the effectiveness of this organization known as Lincoln’s Legal 
Loyal League (or simply the 4Ls) in the Mississippi Valley that made 
Stanton’s offer to commission Frederick Douglass as an assistant to 
General Lorenzo Thomas unnecessary.  Douglass was simply not the best 
qualified for such an assignment.  The League dispatched many “effective
 agents” to the Mississippi Valley in 1863 to assist General Thomas in 
recruiting and to assist General Ulysses S. Grant in military 
operations.  Soon after Douglass met with President Lincoln on August 8,
 1863, the President received a letter from General Grant declaring, “By
 arming the negro we have added a powerful ally.”
The
 three issues covered by Douglass in his first meeting with Lincoln were
 1) the unequal pay mandated by Congress in section 15 of the Militia 
Act of 1862, which authorized the enlistment of men of African descent 
into the army, 2) the commissioning of African descent officers, and 3) 
the treatment of African descent soldiers when captured.  On June 15, 
1864, President Lincoln signed legislation that equalized the pay and 
granted arrears to African descent soldiers.  As for commissions, it is 
important to note that over eighty African American officers had been 
commissioned before August 1863.  Lincoln had ordered the commissioning 
of Dr. Alexander Augusta as a captain in October 1862.  Over seventy 
African Americans had been commissioned in the Department of the Gulf 
upon the recommendation of General Benjamin Butler and approved by the 
War Department before January 1, 1863. However, General Nathaniel 
Banks forced most of the officers commissioned by General Butler out of 
service by the summer of 1863, and it was not until late 1864 that 
commissions were submitted and approved for combat arms officers in the 
Eastern Theater.  Chaplains had been commissioned in that theater as 
early as September 1863.  President Lincoln ordered the commissioning of
 Martin Delany as a major of infantry in February 1865.  Major Delany 
became the commander of the 104th
 US Colored Infantry, and O. S. B. Wall was commissioned a captain and 
became the regiment’s executive officer.  Lewis Douglass, the original 
sergeant major of the 54th Massachusetts, like many other senior noncommissioned officers in the 54th
 was competent enough to be an officer.  Lewis, however, was discharged 
for medical reasons in May 1864 and was not among the noncommissioned 
officers from the 54th
 who did receive commissions.  Finally, on the issue of the treatment of
 African descent POWs, the Confederates eventually changed their policy 
and behavior due primarily to the retributions exacted by Generals Grant
 and Butler.  Also of note is that the unsanctioned actions of 
Confederate soldiers such as the massacre at Fort Pillow were brought to
 an end by the retributions exacted by African descent soldiers. 
 General John Alexander Logan wrote, “The cry with which our Union black
 soldiers went into battle – ‘Remember Fort Pillow’ – inspired them to 
great deeds of valor, and struck with fear the hearts of the enemy. 
 Fort Pillow was avenged on many a bloody field.”
Frederick Douglass was indeed an important American abolitionist and an influential editor
 before and during the Civil War.  But we must be cautious not to 
overstate Douglass’ role as an African American leader.  If we truly 
want to understand the contributions of African Americans in their fight
 for freedom, we must dig deep into the archives, which include the 
notable works of Douglass and the works of many others who were far more
 prolific recruiters and far more effective leaders within America’s African descent communities.    
       
 
 
